The Great Tribunal is a legal simulation engine where arguments are rigorously enforced. If you make a claim, you must prove it. Pick a case from history or create your own. Argue it against an AI opponent under a calibrated burden of proof. The AI judge monitors every claim in real time and automatically shifts the burden if you overreach. Watch your actual words become a documentary film — with AI images, professional voices, a full trial, and an honest verdict.
In most platforms, you just argue back and forth endlessly. In The Great Tribunal, arguments cannot drift. The platform embeds the burden of proof into the structure of the game. You win by meeting the standard, or you lose by failing it. The AI enforces proof, not persuasion.
Build your argument from the evidence. Challenge the defence. The AI opponent adapts to the strength of every argument you make.
Counter every charge. But be careful what you claim. If you make an assertion the AI judge classifies as extraordinary, you will be required to prove it with specific evidence.
Watch the arguments, observe the burden shifts, weigh the evidence. Cast your vote. Your verdict feeds the AI's formal evaluation.
This is the moment that defines the game. If you concede one point while claiming something larger — something that shifts the factual ground of the case — the AI judge interrupts.
The AI detects the moment you concede a material fact while asserting a larger equivalence. "Yes, the cement isn't there — but the PVC pipe does the same job."
A visual interruption in the proceedings. The judge announces that an extraordinary claim has been detected and that the burden of proof shifts in exact terms.
The AI generates the specific evidence required to survive your claim. A named category of document or specific regulatory reference. Rhetoric will not satisfy it.
The final verdict evaluates whether the standard was met. The film records the whole sequence. You can watch yourself argue your way into a trap.
"The Trial of William Challoner v. Sir Isaac Newton, 1699"
A counterfeiter goes to court against the Master of the Royal Mint. Every voice is AI. Every narrative decision was made by the system. This is what a completed proceeding sounds like as a documentary.
▶ Listen to the full productionHistorical trials, philosophical debates, contemporary controversies. If it can be argued, it can be tried.
Before anyone argues, an AI magistrate reviews the charges and sets the burden of proof to a legally rigorous standard. Every trial starts on a fair footing.
Upload images — documents, artefacts, charts. The AI director decides when to reveal each piece during the trial for maximum dramatic effect.
The AI opponent plays its role seriously. Make an extraordinary claim, and the proceedings stop. The trap closes.
The system produces a film of the full trial. Prelude narration, trial phase, and an honest verdict based on the proven facts.
A forger faces Sir Isaac Newton, Master of the Royal Mint. Did Newton pursue justice or personal vendetta? Can the defence shift the burden to Newton's methods?
Science vs authority. What is the burden of proof for heresy? Can the prosecution survive if the defence demands empirical standards?
The trial that never happened. Can the prosecution meet a criminal burden of proof? Or does the defence shift it to systemic failure?
Two hundred years of economic argument compressed into one proceeding. Which side can meet the burden on monetary stability?
Make your case. The AI will argue back — and hold you to a standard you cannot redefine mid-trial. Your words will be filmed. The verdict will be honest.